+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. (/thread-809.html)
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - -JKP- - 18-11-2016
I just had a thought while looking at your examples, Wladimir.
There are a couple of places in the VMS where this occurs... (the 4o with the Latin overline abbreviation/apostrophe shown bottom-right for 90r1):
And then I was thinking how odd 115r and 80r look (the 4o with the double line).
If I had seen only 115r, I would be tempted to dismiss it as a mistake or stray penstroke, but 80r looks more deliberate and then it occurred to me, does it mean something different from the overline? or is it a way of incorporating the overline into the character to make it less obvious that it's an overline?
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Anton - 19-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - -JKP- - 19-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Anton - 19-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - -JKP- - 19-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Davidsch - 19-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - -JKP- - 20-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 20-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Anton - 20-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 20-11-2016