![]() |
|
Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Voynich Talk (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories (/thread-3326.html) |
RE: Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories - Mark Knowles - 25-08-2020 (25-08-2020, 11:45 PM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.By the time it gets to Kircher, the connection to its origin and makers is lost. Yes, pre-Emperor Rudolf II and it starts to get interesting. If someone can say where the manuscript was in 1500 that becomes very interesting. If someone can say where the manuscript was in 1800 that is, in my opinion, much much less interesting. RE: Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories - ReneZ - 26-08-2020 RE: Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories - zamolxe - 26-08-2020 RE: Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories - Aga Tentakulus - 26-08-2020 RE: Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories - ReneZ - 26-08-2020 RE: Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories - Aga Tentakulus - 26-08-2020 RE: Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories - MichelleL11 - 26-08-2020 RE: Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories - Mark Knowles - 30-08-2020 RE: Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories - Mark Knowles - 30-08-2020 RE: Discussion of Voynich MS-related theories - nickpelling - 30-08-2020 |