+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: Historical Context (/thread-3737.html)
RE: Historical Context - ReneZ - 02-04-2022
I proposed:
Quote:1) take a known plain text in the language that you are proposing.
2) convert it into Voynich MS writing using your rules
3) demonstrate that this result shows the known properties of the Voynich MS text.
and then Ahmet wrote that Step 2 is meaningless.
Well, if the Voynich MS text is a rendition of some old Turkish language or dialect, then the above procedure is how it was written.
It has to be possible to describe this. This is not solving it for a second time. This is part of the evidence.
If it is not possible to describe this, then the theory cannot be accepted.
In that case, the work is reduced to extracting Turkish-like words from the text.
This is exactly what happened in the case of Newbold's solution. He came up with quite reasonable Latin text. However, the method how this text would have been encoded in the Voynich MS ddid not exist. The decryption step was not reversible.
The encryption / encoding / translation step when the MS was written must exist.
The reverse, namely the decoding or back translation step may or may not exist.
RE: Historical Context - Ahmet Ardıç - 02-04-2022
RE: Historical Context - Ahmet Ardıç - 02-04-2022
RE: Historical Context - Aga Tentakulus - 02-04-2022
RE: Historical Context - Ahmet Ardıç - 02-04-2022
RE: Historical Context - Ahmet Ardıç - 02-04-2022
RE: Historical Context - Aga Tentakulus - 02-04-2022
RE: Historical Context - Juan_Sali - 02-04-2022
RE: Historical Context - Battler - 02-04-2022
RE: Historical Context - Battler - 02-04-2022