+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: Why not positional variation? (/thread-4361.html)
RE: Why not positional variation? - Koen G - 12-05-2025
I'm not sure if I understand correctly what this does exactly. It says for "Relative probability of ld{?}" that "g" is first with 0.85.
RE: Why not positional variation? - oshfdk - 12-05-2025
RE: Why not positional variation? - oshfdk - 12-05-2025
RE: Why not positional variation? - Koen G - 12-05-2025
RE: Why not positional variation? - oshfdk - 12-05-2025
RE: Why not positional variation? - Koen G - 12-05-2025
RE: Why not positional variation? - oshfdk - 12-05-2025
RE: Why not positional variation? - ReneZ - 13-05-2025
RE: Why not positional variation? - oshfdk - 13-05-2025
RE: Why not positional variation? - Aga Tentakulus - 13-05-2025