+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. (/thread-809.html)
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Anton - 20-11-2016
Have a look at f107r, line 15, second to las vord (raiin).
The r here betrays the way in which it has been written. It is extended EVA &172; (found most notably in f57v) with an apostrophe appended!
Does this designate the difference between two kinds of r (one with the tail modifier attached to the top of the line, another with the tail modifier attached slightly down from the top)? Or this is the way in which all r's are supposed to be composed?
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 20-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Anton - 20-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Davidsch - 22-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Anton - 22-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - -JKP- - 23-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Davidsch - 23-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Koen G - 23-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 23-11-2016
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - ReneZ - 23-11-2016