![]() |
|
ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. (/thread-809.html) |
RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - VViews - 23-11-2016 This is a fascinating thread. Wladimir D, I notice that in your first post you noted the hands/languages for each example, but not the subsequent ones. I would like to ask: is the presence of certain artifacts in any way correlated to the Currier hands? If there are two scribes involved, I wonder if one of them may have been more inclined to sloppy glyphs /creativity than the other. Also are they in any way correlated to Currier languages A/B? If one "language" contains certain artifacts and the other doesn't, that would possibly be significant. RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - ReneZ - 23-11-2016 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - -JKP- - 23-11-2016 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 23-11-2016 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - ReneZ - 23-11-2016 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 28-11-2016 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - -JKP- - 28-11-2016 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 01-12-2016 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - -JKP- - 02-12-2016 RE: ARTIFACTS IN THE TEXT. - Wladimir D - 14-12-2016 |