![]() |
|
No text, but a visual code - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html) +--- Thread: No text, but a visual code (/thread-2384.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
|
RE: No text, but a visual code - ReneZ - 27-04-2022 (26-04-2022, 04:47 PM)Antonio García Jiménez wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Hello René: Dear Antonio, what you are referring to is probably the following: I consider that the zodiac part of the Voynich MS refers to the degrees of the zodiac. There are 30 for each sign, so each 'nymph holding a star' represents one degree. The more hypothetical part of this consideration is that each degree of the zodiac is being associated with one star. This was done in classical astronomy, e.g. looking at stars rising at the same time as the particular degree of the zodiac. But there are other possibilities: star longitudes were expressed this way as well. In this hypothesis, the different number of points of each star held by the nymph is a measure of its brightness (magnitude). The posture of the nymph might indicate other properties of the associated event. There are some tantalising 'coincidences', but I have not been able to find any usable evidence that all this is correct. (I wish that future proposers of Voynich solutions would memorise this last sentence and keep it in mind always). All the other parts of the MS for are just what they look like, or, alternatively, were meant to look what they look like. RE: No text, but a visual code - Koen G - 27-04-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - Antonio García Jiménez - 27-04-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - Ruby Novacna - 27-04-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - cvetkakocj@rogers.com - 28-04-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - Antonio García Jiménez - 28-04-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - Ruby Novacna - 28-04-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - R. Sale - 28-04-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - Antonio García Jiménez - 28-04-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - Ruby Novacna - 28-04-2022 |