+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Marginalia (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-45.html)
+--- Thread: 116v (/thread-437.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
RE: 116v - Anton - 03-05-2021
(03-05-2021, 05:12 PM)farmerjohn wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Anton, unfortunately this statement is false. It's even more false for physics and completely false for linguistics, biology, history, etc.
You know what I mean. I mean independent validation and reproducibility. If your result is not reproducible, does not withstand fact checking or has logical flaws, it would not - or, rather, should not, - be accepted as confirmed.
(03-05-2021, 05:12 PM)farmerjohn wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So the best way is to believe in arguments and intuition.
I'm afraid that with this approach, when arguments are believed instead of validated, we won't move forward. This is absolutely the same as "believing" in any Voyich theory of one's choice.
RE: 116v - Anton - 03-05-2021
RE: 116v - geoffreycaveney - 03-05-2021
RE: 116v - Anton - 03-05-2021
RE: 116v - farmerjohn - 03-05-2021
RE: 116v - Anton - 03-05-2021
RE: 116v - Helmut Winkler - 03-05-2021
RE: 116v - -JKP- - 03-05-2021
RE: 116v - Anton - 03-05-2021
RE: 116v - geoffreycaveney - 03-05-2021