![]() |
|
No text, but a visual code - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html) +--- Thread: No text, but a visual code (/thread-2384.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
|
RE: No text, but a visual code - Linda - 20-12-2022 I think Capricorn and Aquarius were removed. Possibly it is one of the pages mentioned in the letters to Kircher. From voynich.nu: Voynich MS - Quire 12 Description Quire 12 contains the remains of one bifolio, which is folio 73. The original folio 74 is lost and was most probably cut out of the bound manuscript. A cut mark is still visible on f75. The gathering mark is also missing, but may be assumed to have been on f74. Schematic folio layout: ![]() Aries and Taurus have more detail in my interpretation due to being the astronomical ages with the most known history. What would be the purpose of replacing the winter months with dual spring months? To show global warming? I could see that, actually. I can't understand your reasoning, though. Can you explain more fully why it would make more sense that way? Drawing spring twice doesn't make it happen. Did they draw it twice because it happened? RE: No text, but a visual code - nablator - 20-12-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - Antonio García Jiménez - 21-12-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - Linda - 22-12-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - nablator - 22-12-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - R. Sale - 22-12-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - Aga Tentakulus - 22-12-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - Juan_Sali - 23-12-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - Antonio García Jiménez - 23-12-2022 RE: No text, but a visual code - Antonio García Jiménez - 26-12-2022 |