+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Voynich Talk (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-6.html)
+--- Thread: Considered as visionary art (/thread-1061.html)
Pages:
1
2
Considered as visionary art - Charles Packer - 10-11-2016
Excuse my dropping in from out of left field, but I read in Nature
last week a review of a new book about the manuscript. Now I've
been studying Rene Zandbergen's gorgeous website devoted to it.
Has anybody ever suggested that the VMS is no more (or less) than
a prodigious piece of what nowadays we call outsider or visionary
art, that happens to include a faux script as part of its
invention? If not, I'd be glad to elaborate on the notion, drawing
on my background in psychology and art appreciation.
RE: Considered as visionary art - -JKP- - 10-11-2016
RE: Considered as visionary art - Sam G - 10-11-2016
RE: Considered as visionary art - Koen G - 10-11-2016
RE: Considered as visionary art - davidjackson - 10-11-2016
RE: Considered as visionary art - Diane - 12-11-2016
RE: Considered as visionary art - bi3mw - 04-12-2021
RE: Considered as visionary art - merrimacga - 09-06-2023
RE: Considered as visionary art - Koen G - 09-06-2023
RE: Considered as visionary art - merrimacga - 09-06-2023