![]() |
|
Relation between text study and imagery study - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Voynich Talk (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: Relation between text study and imagery study (/thread-1368.html) Pages:
1
2
|
Relation between text study and imagery study - Koen G - 29-12-2016 This is a bit of a philosophical question: what comes first, the imagery or the text? Should we try to understand the images better first, or try to crack the text first? Which one will offer the easiest entrance? Which one will help us understand the other better? There are some arguments that can shoot this thread down, so I would like to get them out of the way already. Let's hypothesize that:
--- When I started studying the manuscript - after having read some introductory material - I first focused on the text. With some naive enthusiasm, which you probably recognize. I soon realized that there were just too many unknowns to have a go at it without any foothold, so I gradually shifted my attention to the imagery. I am now growing more convinced that a profound understanding of the imagery is required before we can figure out the text. Studying the images can teach us:
RE: Relation between text study and imagery study - stellar - 29-12-2016 RE: Relation between text study and imagery study - -JKP- - 29-12-2016 RE: Relation between text study and imagery study - Sam G - 30-12-2016 RE: Relation between text study and imagery study - Diane - 30-12-2016 RE: Relation between text study and imagery study - ThomasCoon - 30-12-2016 RE: Relation between text study and imagery study - ThomasCoon - 30-12-2016 RE: Relation between text study and imagery study - Koen G - 30-12-2016 RE: Relation between text study and imagery study - Anton - 30-12-2016 RE: Relation between text study and imagery study - Koen G - 30-12-2016 |