![]() |
|
Cloud bands and the scallops in the sky - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Imagery (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-43.html) +--- Thread: Cloud bands and the scallops in the sky (/thread-1429.html) |
Cloud bands and the scallops in the sky - R. Sale - 10-01-2017 Clearly there is an interesting example of a cloud band in the VMs central rosette. It was brought to my attention by Don of Tallahassee a while back. His investigations were significant (IMO), but not always focused on the definition provided by the VMs example. And the definition is: Scallop. Having seen examples that other investigators have posted, it is clear that the VMs example in the central rosette follows the general representation of a scallop much better than some of the other interesting contributions. If you take a nebuly line, one that is clearly bulbous, and across the top of these shoulders, you run an engrailed line, like a short series of 'mmmm's, then there you have it - a scallop. An alternating sequence of cloud scallops makes a cloud band. But I have to say, scallops in the sky sounds pretty nebuly to me. A unfortunate choice of etymology, one might say. Are there better matches to the scallop-patterned cloud band found in the VMs central rosette than those we see in the illustrations of Oresme and de Pizan? RE: Cloud bands and the scallops in the sky - Linda - 08-02-2017 RE: Cloud bands and the scallops in the sky - Koen G - 08-02-2017 RE: Cloud bands and the scallops in the sky - Linda - 09-02-2017 RE: Cloud bands and the scallops in the sky - Koen G - 09-02-2017 RE: Cloud bands and the scallops in the sky - R. Sale - 11-02-2017 RE: Cloud bands and the scallops in the sky - Linda - 12-02-2017 RE: Cloud bands and the scallops in the sky - R. Sale - 04-03-2017 |