![]() |
|
[split] About knowing the history of Voynich research - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Voynich Talk (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: [split] About knowing the history of Voynich research (/thread-3148.html) |
[split] About knowing the history of Voynich research - Koen G - 07-04-2020 [EDIT: this post started a tangent in the previous thread about being able to discern where old ideas are coming from etc, I thought I'd better split it into its own thread] Marco's image reminds me of Brian Cham's curve-line system. I'm not entirely on board with his system per se, but the underlying observations are valuable. RE: Is [a] always [a]? - -JKP- - 07-04-2020 RE: Is [a] always [a]? - ReneZ - 07-04-2020 RE: Is [a] always [a]? - -JKP- - 07-04-2020 RE: Is [a] always [a]? - Koen G - 07-04-2020 RE: Is [a] always [a]? - ReneZ - 07-04-2020 RE: Is [a] always [a]? - RenegadeHealer - 07-04-2020 RE: [split] About knowing the history of Voynich research - -JKP- - 07-04-2020 RE: [split] About knowing the history of Voynich research - Koen G - 07-04-2020 RE: [split] About knowing the history of Voynich research - ReneZ - 07-04-2020 |