![]() |
|
qo- vord formation - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: qo- vord formation (/thread-3161.html) |
qo- vord formation - ThomasCoon - 19-04-2020 Hello all, long time no see! I've been looking at qo- vords and would like to hypothesize a paradigm to form them: [q] + [o/a/y] + [k/t/p/f] + [ch/che/chee/Sh/ee/etc.] + [o/a/y] + [r/l] + [d/s] + [o/a/y] + [n/in/iin/iiin/m/im/etc.] In this paradigm, a group may be present or not (e.g. qotchol vs. qotcho). My theory is that presence or absence of certain characters may be input for a corresponding decoding table. I am assuming that all the gallows characters are functionally equivalent, following Mary D'imperio (1978 pgs. 24-25) and also Marco Ponzi who put them into the same Character class You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., but I also assume this about the (usually) interchangeable ch/Sh/ee group. Here are some examples: qotchoiin qotcham qopchor qokShol qotchol qoteeol qokcheo qokShy qokchy qotchy qoteeey qokeey qokey qoky qoty qokeeo qotcho qodaiin qosaiin qotaiin qokaiin What are your thoughts? RE: qo- vord formation - ThomasCoon - 19-04-2020 RE: qo- vord formation - -JKP- - 19-04-2020 RE: qo- vord formation - Anton - 19-04-2020 RE: qo- vord formation - -JKP- - 19-04-2020 RE: qo- vord formation - ThomasCoon - 20-04-2020 RE: qo- vord formation - MarcoP - 20-04-2020 RE: qo- vord formation - -JKP- - 20-04-2020 RE: qo- vord formation - Gavin Güldenpfennig - 23-04-2020 RE: qo- vord formation - RenegadeHealer - 23-04-2020 |