![]() |
|
k/t gallows reduplication - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: k/t gallows reduplication (/thread-3942.html) |
k/t gallows reduplication - nablator - 09-02-2023 I don't remember reading about how the k/t gallows sequence compares to random and human-generated pseudo-random sequences. It is likely that I missed something, so please point me to any existing analysis. There is a blog post by Emma May Smith but it does not discuss the reduplication statistics: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. -------------------------------------------------- TLDR: The k/t gallows sequence is strongly biased toward reduplication; especially long sequences of the same k/t gallows in a row. What is interesting about it is that human-generated pseudo-random sequences have a "tendency to overalternate between outcomes" documented in psychology studies. See for example: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and the referenced literature. Why do we see the opposite tendency in the VMS? -------------------------------------------------- EVA-k is more frequent than EVA-t. In the ZL transliteration, in paragraphs only, there are: k = 10096, probability(k) = pk = 62% t = 6063, probability(t) = pt = 38% In few cases of ambiguity, I kept the first: for example [k:t] = k. With perfectly random independent draws, in any window of n letters of the k/t sequence, the probability of having: n times k is pk^n n times t is pt^n The expected number of windows of n identical letters in the k/t sequence is the probability multiplied by the number of windows: For k: (k+t-n+1)*pk^n For t: (k+t-n+1)*pt^n The expected numbers are ek, et (rounded), the actual numbers are ak, at: n ek < ak et < at 2 6307 6956 2274 2924 3 3940 4938 853 1554 4 2461 3593 320 870 5 1538 2686 120 501 6 960 2029 45 300 7 600 1565 16 184 8 375 1214 6 117 9 234 950 2 76 10 146 752 0 50 11 91 595 0 32 12 57 465 0 21 Note: if you count kk... and tt... sequences with a text editor like Notepad++, the numbers will be lower, because it skips to the text following the matched pattern instead of doing a "rolling window" search. RE: k/t gallows reduplication - nablator - 10-02-2023 RE: k/t gallows reduplication - MarcoP - 10-02-2023 RE: k/t gallows reduplication - nablator - 10-02-2023 RE: k/t gallows reduplication - nablator - 10-02-2023 RE: k/t gallows reduplication - MarcoP - 12-02-2023 RE: k/t gallows reduplication - nablator - 12-02-2023 RE: k/t gallows reduplication - R. Sale - 12-02-2023 RE: k/t gallows reduplication - nablator - 12-02-2023 RE: k/t gallows reduplication - ReneZ - 13-02-2023 |