![]() |
|
Has anyone ever tried something different than substitution cipher? - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Has anyone ever tried something different than substitution cipher? (/thread-3967.html) |
Has anyone ever tried something different than substitution cipher? - Rafal - 16-03-2023 There were many attempts of reading Voynich manuscript. Probably I don't know all of them but it seems to me most of them was treating Voynich script like a simple, monoalphabetic, substitution cipher. This sign is "s", this sign is "a", this sign is "g". and so on. And it never changes through all the text. My question is - has anyone ever tried something more advanced? Syllabic cipher, Alberti cipher, treating "vords" as numbers and so on? If there were such attempts, what were the results? RE: Has anyone ever tried something different than substitution cipher? - Mark Knowles - 16-03-2023 RE: Has anyone ever tried something different than substitution cipher? - R. Sale - 16-03-2023 RE: Has anyone ever tried something different than substitution cipher? - nablator - 16-03-2023 RE: Has anyone ever tried something different than substitution cipher? - MarcoP - 16-03-2023 |