![]() |
|
Theory: it says "visch" for fish, not the month of the year. - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Theories & Solutions (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-58.html) +--- Thread: Theory: it says "visch" for fish, not the month of the year. (/thread-5996.html) |
Theory: it says "visch" for fish, not the month of the year. - Damiro - 02-08-2026 Translation to English is "Fish" Language isĀ Old High German form and variations are: [*] fisc [*]fisk [*]fisch [*]fish [*]fisg [*]variants beginning with v, including visc, visch, and visg - Most likely phonemic ? ![]() Theory derived from: - The amount of letters/symbols. - The assumptions regarding the origin of a scribe - The year it was written (1400s to 1500s) - In my language (Slavic) we say "fish" for this zodiac as well. The only thing that does not match well is the shape of symbols... RE: Theory: it says "visch" for fish, not the month of the year. - Koen G - 02-08-2026 RE: Theory: it says "visch" for fish, not the month of the year. - ololololo - 03-08-2026 RE: Theory: it says "visch" for fish, not the month of the year. - Aga Tentakulus - 04-08-2026 RE: Theory: it says "visch" for fish, not the month of the year. - JoJo_Jost - 04-08-2026 RE: Theory: it says "visch" for fish, not the month of the year. - Aga Tentakulus - 04-08-2026 RE: Theory: it says "visch" for fish, not the month of the year. - Koen G - 04-08-2026 RE: Theory: it says "visch" for fish, not the month of the year. - JoJo_Jost - 04-08-2026 RE: Theory: it says "visch" for fish, not the month of the year. - eggyk - 04-08-2026 RE: Theory: it says "visch" for fish, not the month of the year. - rikforto - 04-08-2026 |