![]() |
|
Numbers, abbeviations, dual-sense endings and similar nuisances - Printable Version +- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja) +-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html) +--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html) +--- Thread: Numbers, abbeviations, dual-sense endings and similar nuisances (/thread-801.html) |
Numbers, abbeviations, dual-sense endings and similar nuisances - Diane - 28-09-2016 I've been wanting to ask the linguists this question for some time, but it always seems to come out as a criticism or challenge. All I can say is that it's a genuine question from someone who dropped Linguistics 101 after six months. Are statistical analyses and linguistic analyses able to isolate non-word uses for glyphs? If you have - for argument's sake - something like [glyph meaning 'city'] + [City name, abbreviated]+ [number]+['degrees' sign/letter] [N, S, W or E].. would a linguist be able to determine which of the glyphs was being used as a number.. or as probably a number.. and which were abbreviations and so on? Second question: If he script is filled with numbers, abbreviations and so on, how does the statistical analysis serve a useful purpose.. again, it's a genuine question. RE: Numbers, abbeviations, dual-sense endings and similar nuisances - ThomasCoon - 28-09-2016 RE: Numbers, abbeviations, dual-sense endings and similar nuisances - Koen G - 28-09-2016 RE: Numbers, abbeviations, dual-sense endings and similar nuisances - -JKP- - 28-09-2016 RE: Numbers, abbeviations, dual-sense endings and similar nuisances - Diane - 29-09-2016 RE: Numbers, abbeviations, dual-sense endings and similar nuisances - stellar - 29-09-2016 |