+- The Voynich Ninja (https://www.voynich.ninja)
+-- Forum: Voynich Research (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-27.html)
+--- Forum: Analysis of the text (https://www.voynich.ninja/forum-41.html)
+--- Thread: BROAD "GALLOWS" (/thread-940.html)
BROAD "GALLOWS" - Wladimir D - 21-10-2016
I represent all the "wide gallows" "the k" and "t", as well as a non-standard a selection gallows "f" and "p".
Your thoughts about these characters?
Figure 23 and 24 - the same glyph.
I ask to make the computer processing of the dedicated fragment of yellow in Figure 12. My opinion: on the left leg is a loop. If is the loop, there in the text at all is no the "broad gallows" "k".
There are a thread, which discusses why the is no double gallows? My suggestion:
Figure 38 - "p + p"
Figure 42 - "p + f"
Figure 28 - "f + t"
Figure 29 - "k + k"
In Figure 27, the author originally wanted to to write normal gallows "p", but then extended the line up and wrote "wide gallows" "p".
RE: BROAD "GALLOWS" - Anton - 21-10-2016
RE: BROAD "GALLOWS" - ThomasCoon - 21-10-2016
RE: BROAD "GALLOWS" - Anton - 21-10-2016
RE: BROAD "GALLOWS" - Wladimir D - 24-10-2016
RE: BROAD "GALLOWS" - ThomasCoon - 24-10-2016