Discussion of Yulia May's proposed solution

[Searcher]

On the plant page (f18v) I was looking at the interpretations for some of the glyphs.

If I'm reading them correctly, you have interpreted the EVA-t (t) as follows:

Line 1: P, ?, b, p
Line 4: p
Line 5: B
Line 6: m, m/nim
Line 8: pl, plet (pleti, mot, moti)
Line 9: nim (pi), p


and the EVA-k (k) as follows:

Line 2: qu, qu, nic
Line 3: leg, leg, c (qu), loqu
Line 4: c, qu, c
Line 5: c, qu
Line 6: n, cret
Line 7: gn (leg), luc
Line 8: cr
Line 9: c (n, l), qu, n
Line 10: gel, cl

I've spaced out the lines a bit so it's easier to read, and given them numbers so they can be referenced:

Not at all, in my interpretation, mentioned characters have such values:
t – m(e), p(e), pp, b(e)
k – c(e), g(e), q
o – o, n(*), l(*), in – prefix and preposition
a - r(*)
For example, the word from the line 8 "ytor": the general base of its interpretation is "cum+p/b/m+o/l/n+tur/tor*/tione", where "cum-" takes the shape of "con-", "can-", "com-" or "cum" depending on the next letter and the word generally. Maybe, it was the reason of the coice of alternates for the characters k and t (con- - before c, g, q; com- or cum- - before m, p, b). The possible alternates for this: completor, commotor, completione, commotione, commentor.
One more example - the word "ykam" from the same line: the base - "cum+c/g/q/k+r*+tus/tas/tis". The possible alternates for it: concretus, congeretis, concertas. K - is quite rare in Latin, especially in the center of the word. Q - always needs a vowel after it ( ch, c) which always is "u".

[-JKP-]

Register or login to view the content

[Searcher]

Register or login to view the content

[-JKP-]

Register or login to view the content

[Searcher]

Register or login to view the content

[MarcoP]

Register or login to view the content

[Searcher]

Register or login to view the content

[Davidsch]

Register or login to view the content

[-JKP-]

Register or login to view the content

[Searcher]

Register or login to view the content