Release of the Radiocarbon Report & Link
#31
A particular dating would rule out certain languages that were "invented/created" in a later period. For example You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (I don't know if such a link is allowed, if not, please remove), Pitman Shorthand.

Secondly from the cipher perspective, certain innovations that were of a later period can be ruled out. For example You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

Personally, I find 14xx too early for various reasons but it mainly depends on personal experience and knowledge,
and I lean more towards 1525-1540, based on the cryptographic viewpoint and the development of handwritten symbols but
from a scientific viewpoint the carbondating has ultimately more weight than anything else, unless ... You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Reply
#32
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to ReneZ for this post
Reply
#33
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#34
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to proto57 for this post
Reply
#35
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#36
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#37
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#38
Register or login to view the content
[+] 2 users say Thank You to MarcoP for this post
Reply
#39
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#40
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to ReneZ for this post
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)