A priori or A posteriori cracking?
#1
Which is better for cracking the Voynich Manuscript? Thinking that a certain page talks about what is displayed in the page? Or thinking that it has no specific meaning relative to the featured pictures in the page? To rephrase my question, I want to know whether the cryptologists that deal with languages have ever tried to crack natural languages without a priori knowledge, just to test how strong their methods are. For example, has anyone tried to learn Korean or a similar language by studying a random Korean book and relying only on that book just to test the effectiveness of the code breaking methods that he relies on?
Reply
#2
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#3
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#4
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#5
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#6
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#7
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#8
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#9
Register or login to view the content
Reply
#10
Register or login to view the content
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)