No text, but a visual code
Take it easy nablator, this race is long. I understand that my theory about the script seems absurd to you. It's very difficult to see. What bothers me is that someone like you who has a 5 reputation is not able to say anything regarding the explanation I have given of folio 67v2. All criticism, none support. And I don't think anyone has explained that page as I have, as anyone initiated into astrology understands it.

You are not the only one. People I appreciate intellectually also tend to respond with indifference. Nor invoking the name of a renowned art historian like Panofsky as I have done on countless occasions to explain Quire 13.

I have sometimes wondered about the usefulness of this forum. I trust above all in those people who, without being a member, enter the web daily and just want to know.
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
[+] 3 users say Thank You to RobGea for this post
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to tavie for this post
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to Antonio García Jiménez for this post
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
Reply
Register or login to view the content
[+] 1 user says Thank You to Antonio García Jiménez for this post
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 25 Guest(s)