17-03-2026, 12:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 17-03-2026, 01:08 PM by Torsten.
Edit Reason: wording
)
(17-03-2026, 11:42 AM)Koen G wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.My confusion came from how you presented all the "gas" attestations as evidence, while they are not all the same word... The occurrence and spelling of some form of "gehen" as "gas" is not relevant for the argument that it could be a contraction of "gahes".
It was actually a response to your claim that "gasmich" is most likely one word and my argument was: Since "gâs" appears with both long-s and short-s in medieval German texts, the form of the s on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. cannot be used as an argument for reading "gasmich" as a single word.
As far as I see, these are the two suggested readings for the last line of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. in this thread:
1) Volkhard Huth's reading: "so nim gâs mich" — two words, the adverb "gâs" (swiftly, at once) and the pronoun "mich" (me). This reading requires accepting that the long-s can be word-final on this page.
2) Richard Salomon's reading from the 1950s: "so nim gaismilch" — one word, a dialectal form of "Gaismilch" (goat's milk). This reading requires three assumptions: monophthongization of "gais" to "gas," an unattested omission of L in "milch," and reading the long-s as word-medial.
My goal was to present some evidence for Huth's reading. I believe I have done that.
![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)