I'm sorry Jorge but sincerely I cannot see how it's still possible to believe that p/f are variants of k/t (or ke/te iirc). There are multiple lines of evidence now that they behave differently, so it's quite improbable one is the replacement of another in some particular topological case. One could invoke some special rule, but without independent evidence for it it would just be an ad-hoc.
|
The evolution of P/F vs T/K raises important questions
|
|
Yesterday, 06:09 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 07:41 PM by Jorge_Stolfi.)
Yesterday, 07:40 PM
(This post was last modified: Yesterday, 07:46 PM by Jorge_Stolfi.)
5 hours ago
(This post was last modified: 5 hours ago by Jorge_Stolfi.)
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)