I found Gaia-Gea

[bunny]

It is astronomical and factual.  Not quite finished but tomorrow maybe.  The only thing I can come up with for this is that Stellar may be joking with us, it is too accurate not to be a hoax.  If Stellar insists he is honest with his results then why is no one listening to him?  All I see are put downs and jibes.  I am sorry to go on about this but the words he presents are accurate, correct and factual but like he just misses out the final step in translation.  I really am not joking about this but it just seems to get lost in the background.

Very respectfully the language that stellar claims to have decoded is not Latin. I have a college degree in Classics (heavy in Latin) and 9 years of translating Latin, and the language is simply not Latin or any dialect / language related to Latin.

Respectfully in return his work is of interest to me and my own particular view for very specific reasons.  Given the premise I have that the text/glyphs are representative of more than one language, the essence of what is meant rather than conjugated endings and full sentences, the stem and few words can carry information.  I do agree with you that "read a book" Latin is not there but it doesn't stop the essence being readable in the oubliette. What Stellar produces by all his various means has meaning to me, not something I can pretend otherwise, being in essence information - in which correct grammar does not need to play a role.  As you are a Latin expert I don't think this approach would be of interest to you, and I'm sure many are working on a standard Latin approach to the text, with a unique back workable 1:1 solution.  This research is however not my area. His work is also reflective of results of others, though again I stress the language used or method or how ungrammatical it may be does not detract from the results I have seen others produce of the same thread.

I'm guessing it's still as clear as mud on where I'm going for the moment.  I will get to that in due course.

Bunny