23-12-2016, 02:52 AM
(This post was last modified: 23-12-2016, 02:53 AM by ThomasCoon.)
(22-12-2016, 09:06 PM)bunny wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Respectfully in return his work is of interest to me and my own particular view for very specific reasons. Given the premise I have that the text/glyphs are representative of more than one language, the essence of what is meant rather than conjugated endings and full sentences, the stem and few words can carry information. I do agree with you that "read a book" Latin is not there but it doesn't stop the essence being readable in the oubliette. What Stellar produces by all his various means has meaning to me, not something I can pretend otherwise, being in essence information - in which correct grammar does not need to play a role. As you are a Latin expert I don't think this approach would be of interest to you, and I'm sure many are working on a standard Latin approach to the text, with a unique back workable 1:1 solution. This research is however not my area. His work is also reflective of results of others, though again I stress the language used or method or how ungrammatical it may be does not detract from the results I have seen others produce of the same thread.
I'm guessing it's still as clear as mud on where I'm going for the moment. I will get to that in due course.
Bunny
Hey Bunny,
It is a great idea that the VMS shows more than one language. That may very well be the case. The only problem I have is with the segment I bolded - the words given are unfortunately very very far from Latin. If they were supposed to be Latin, I honestly do not know what they were intended to be. I will mark the words in red which are not Latin words (either grammatical or ungrammatical):
uoe-- et uoiia men u cuoiien et en uo-- en oiuse-- uoiiu -uia uoiiud uoiud e-- sg-a uoun sena uoiuen sen e-nsa"