05-01-2017, 06:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-01-2017, 08:48 PM by Wladimir D.)
ReneZ
Another observation, which I don't believe I ever mentioned before, is that the one or two 'o' characters in
aror (or oror) Sheey
are not written in the same way as the o's in the 'plain text' part (in my opinion).
This would suggest that the person writing this was not just imitating the Voynich script for the first time, but knew well how to write it.
Note the word "oladabas". In this word is the only distinct character a-EVA in MV style (in marginalia You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and f116v).
This is intentional or accidental?
1. If, is written intentionally, this word ends "ad" = e + i + e + t3 You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
2. If, the style is applied mechanically with a high probability the author of marginalia was involved in the writing of the manuscript (or at the very least owned a script of the manuscript.)
Another observation, which I don't believe I ever mentioned before, is that the one or two 'o' characters in
aror (or oror) Sheey
are not written in the same way as the o's in the 'plain text' part (in my opinion).
This would suggest that the person writing this was not just imitating the Voynich script for the first time, but knew well how to write it.
Note the word "oladabas". In this word is the only distinct character a-EVA in MV style (in marginalia You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and f116v).
This is intentional or accidental?
1. If, is written intentionally, this word ends "ad" = e + i + e + t3 You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
2. If, the style is applied mechanically with a high probability the author of marginalia was involved in the writing of the manuscript (or at the very least owned a script of the manuscript.)