04-02-2016, 06:14 PM
Thanks! That's the more useful statistic.
I was surprised to see values for the k/t (and other) pairs much lower than expected, but that can then probably be explained.
About (i.e. very roughly) half the vocabulary of the MS are words that occur only once in the entire text.
These are less likely to occur each 'in both versions'.
I was surprised to see values for the k/t (and other) pairs much lower than expected, but that can then probably be explained.
About (i.e. very roughly) half the vocabulary of the MS are words that occur only once in the entire text.
These are less likely to occur each 'in both versions'.