06-02-2016, 09:00 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-02-2016, 09:00 PM by Emma May Smith.)
(05-02-2016, 12:19 PM)Torsten wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.@JobHi Torsten, I read your paper soon after it came out, but have only just published You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. It is not the whole of my objections, but a key one.
I have published the auto copying hypothesis in 2014 (see You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.).
So far, three responses were published: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view., You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view..
Two are in favour of my hypothesis and Gordon Rugg only says that he is not convinced.
In summary I would say there are no published arguments against my hypothesis.
In short: your theory relies upon the existence of a rigid structure for Voynich words, but this is inadequately handled and unresolved.

