[split] Why the VMS text is meaningful or meaningless?

[ReneZ]

But in a century, no one has found any convincing evidence of meaningful information encoded in the text.

That's not true. I won't mention the work by Montemurro & Zanette, because, as I noted, you suggest that you were able to reproduce the like results with the random text (however, if one works onwards from the pre-analyzed statistical properties of the text it might be trivial that s/he finds co-occurrences to sustain across the text). But, apart from that, there is quite a number of tiny indications.

I would argue that the presence of "tiny indications" is not contradicting the absence of "convincing evidence".