An explanation of the Voynich Manuscript text

[Emma May Smith]

If it's in an unencrypted natural language, it would have been identified and translated by now.

This assertion (and any opposition to it!) is based on ignorance and untenable as a position. You can neither say "something is false because it is not known to be true", nor can I say "something is true because it is not known to be false". They are just generally bad arguments.