Thanks ReneZ!
I see that quote was in fact lifted from the Blevins article. You mention that among the factoids in the article, some are false: could you point out the ones that seem furthest from the truth?
You mention that "these previously unknown and unique books might be fakes. This could make sense. However, what happened is that of many of them, additional copies turned up later "... that actually makes me wonder about the ones for which additional copies didn't turn up: it would be interesting to see the manuscripts that Voynich might have created himself!
I see that quote was in fact lifted from the Blevins article. You mention that among the factoids in the article, some are false: could you point out the ones that seem furthest from the truth?
You mention that "these previously unknown and unique books might be fakes. This could make sense. However, what happened is that of many of them, additional copies turned up later "... that actually makes me wonder about the ones for which additional copies didn't turn up: it would be interesting to see the manuscripts that Voynich might have created himself!