Yes, accusative masculine plural.
The other variant - "inultes" - is grammatically invalid.
Translations are: unavenged, unpunished, unharmed.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Since masculine, it can't refer to "portas" as "gates" as an applicable adjective. So it may refer to "oladabas" (if the latter is a noun) or stand on its own. If on its own, then it's subject of some action, since accusative determines that. Technically, it can refer to "portas" as "carry"
[You] portas (carry) [in present] - whom? - inultos (the unavenged).
However, "carcere" and "te" then fall out of place. It would have been "tu", not "te": anchiton, you carry the unavenged.
Even if it's not "te", but shorthand for "tunc" (a common abbreviation, only the ligature is missing), nonetheless "carcere" gets orphaned here.
The other variant - "inultes" - is grammatically invalid.
Translations are: unavenged, unpunished, unharmed.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
Since masculine, it can't refer to "portas" as "gates" as an applicable adjective. So it may refer to "oladabas" (if the latter is a noun) or stand on its own. If on its own, then it's subject of some action, since accusative determines that. Technically, it can refer to "portas" as "carry"
[You] portas (carry) [in present] - whom? - inultos (the unavenged).
However, "carcere" and "te" then fall out of place. It would have been "tu", not "te": anchiton, you carry the unavenged.
Even if it's not "te", but shorthand for "tunc" (a common abbreviation, only the ligature is missing), nonetheless "carcere" gets orphaned here.