[split] The Strange Thing on 116v

[Morten St. George]

Umm... no.
There are no flying geese around a tree on the first page of the Voynich Manuscript.
If you are referring to the big red weirdo characters, I don't see anything specific about them that would bring to mind geese rather than, say, seagulls or eagles. They also resemble a lot of other things, as you can see in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. thread.
And they are not around a tree.
There is a plant on f1v, which looks nothing like your barnakle tree.

Also, you still have not addressed Koen Gh's post pointing out that your "cutout" looks nothing like a tapir.
I have highlighted the shape in pink below.
No one in their right mind can believe this looks anything like a tapir:

The tapir is no longer an issue as a few days ago I updated my web page to call it an 'optical illusion' which is what it is.

I think it was quite nasty of Yale to make such a low resolution scan of the VMS pages and, in places where there were large holes in the pages, not to put a blank sheet behind the scan so that we would not confuse what was on the current page with the content of preceding pages. I will now fight Yale even harder on suspected cow protein malfeasance.

Here's the bottom line:

I am able to explain the astrology and other European paraphernalia as deriving from Cathars who fled out to sea in the 13th century to avoid being burned alive by the Inquisition. Voynich drawings substantiate Catharism: depictions of equal numbers of men and women around the governing council, depiction of the Cathar fortress of Montsegur verified by comparison with an independent medieval illustration of Montsegur, depictions of the Cathar ceremony of consolamentum administered by women, and depiction of an aversion to procreation.

But it seems you guys are unable to explain how experts have been able to associate Voynich plant drawings with 59 species of plants found in the New World, whereas, as far as I know, you cannot unambiguously associate anything with European plants, forcing you declare that the plants are imaginary. Moreover, didn't you guys just verify in another thread that a Voynich plant depiction is actually a depiction of a real animal? Why is the animal real and all the plants fake?