12-04-2018, 08:53 PM
Hi Rich,
I prefer to avoid discussions of the 'Voynich faked it' theory.
My previous post presented a number of explanations related to the various Marci letters, and upon re-reading it, I can only say that it still appears completely correct.
Interestingly, it may even still be possible to identify the "scribe" of the 1665 letters.
That is on-going work.
I am not reading the VMS list anymore, so cannot comment on what is written there. Even if I knew, my preference to avoid discussions of this topic would stop me from commenting.
No hard feelings, I hope.
I prefer to avoid discussions of the 'Voynich faked it' theory.
My previous post presented a number of explanations related to the various Marci letters, and upon re-reading it, I can only say that it still appears completely correct.
Interestingly, it may even still be possible to identify the "scribe" of the 1665 letters.
That is on-going work.
I am not reading the VMS list anymore, so cannot comment on what is written there. Even if I knew, my preference to avoid discussions of this topic would stop me from commenting.
No hard feelings, I hope.