As for Currier's comments about the number of hands, I haven't read what he's written; I only know about it second-hand, mostly from the occasional comment on the forum. I didn't want my viewpoint about the handwriting to be influenced by his opinion and I STILL haven't gotten to it (it's been on my VMS things-to-do list for 10 years).
But I do have a question... does Currier mean hands in the main text (Voynichese) or hands in the VMS overall?
I would say there are at least 10 hands and possibly 11 or 12 (not counting the drawings and painting)...
But I do have a question... does Currier mean hands in the main text (Voynichese) or hands in the VMS overall?
I would say there are at least 10 hands and possibly 11 or 12 (not counting the drawings and painting)...
- 116v - at least one hand and possibly two
- 17r - probably same hand as most of the text on 116v
- ven mus mel - after studying these styles of writing more carefully, I now think this MIGHT be a separate hand from 116v/17r
- color annotations - separate hand from the others
- labels on the zodiac figures is a separate hand, someone in a hurry and disrespectful of the drawings
- quire numbers (older style late 14th-century, early 15th-century numerals)
- folio numbers (transitional to early modern numerals in quite a different hand from the quire numbers)
- Voynich main text - at least two hands and possibly one more though I haven't had time to look into any possible additional hands
- column text on 1r (it seems to be different handwriting from all the others)
- de Tepenecz

