31-08-2019, 01:49 PM
What I think are the likely implications for voynichese as a whole of my thinking?
The voynichese contains a large proportion of "null word" filler text. I think likely a larger proportion of filler in the main text than the labels. Again I suspect that null words fall into spelling "clusters" of word with similar spelling I.e. variants of a standard spelling "formulae" or pattern. Though I have studied sentence text much less than label text, but I think it not unlikely that the author had a bias to using different null word clusters in different contexts than others. Different languages could just be different "null languages" i.e. changing mental biases to different null words/null formulae. This is all very speculative, but the most consistent explanation than I can come up with on the basis of my familiarity with the evidence.
The voynichese contains a large proportion of "null word" filler text. I think likely a larger proportion of filler in the main text than the labels. Again I suspect that null words fall into spelling "clusters" of word with similar spelling I.e. variants of a standard spelling "formulae" or pattern. Though I have studied sentence text much less than label text, but I think it not unlikely that the author had a bias to using different null word clusters in different contexts than others. Different languages could just be different "null languages" i.e. changing mental biases to different null words/null formulae. This is all very speculative, but the most consistent explanation than I can come up with on the basis of my familiarity with the evidence.