Ah I see what the problem is:
You found the original, but the attestation of "mich" is from the copy.
Anyway, according to the database, the copy has 2 attestations of "mandelmiLch" compared to the one "maldelmich". Apart from that, there are 23 attestations of "milch", one "milche" and one "milich". So if the transcription is reliable, it looks like the L was dropped only once.
Quote:The German heritage of medieval written cooking recipes comprises 57 recipe collections that hold about 5000 recipes, the main area of tradition is the southern / Bavarian language area. Recipe tradition starts at about 1350 and has its peak in the middle and late 15th century. This number of recipes of course includes copies and duplicates. But within this Early New High German corpus of cooking recipes there are only two identical collections (München, Universitätsbibliothek, 2° Cod. ms. 731 – the so called buoch von guoter spîse – and its direct copy Dessau, Anhaltische Landesbücherei, Hs. Georg. 278.2°) as well as identical recipe groups with only moderate variation handed down in various manuscripts.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You found the original, but the attestation of "mich" is from the copy.
Anyway, according to the database, the copy has 2 attestations of "mandelmiLch" compared to the one "maldelmich". Apart from that, there are 23 attestations of "milch", one "milche" and one "milich". So if the transcription is reliable, it looks like the L was dropped only once.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)