07-01-2020, 03:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-01-2020, 04:04 PM by -JKP-.
Edit Reason: fixed typo: see = seen
)
(07-01-2020, 02:34 PM)Anton wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view....
Pronounciation and writing are different things. While I'm sure it's perfectly possible to pronounce "mich" instead of "milch" (as Thomas Coon, and others, argued a while back in the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. thread), I find it much less probable for one to write down "mich" for "milch". Because "mich" in itself is a very common word, to be confused with "milch" in writing...
This basically sums up how I feel about it. Plus I've never seen "mich" for "milch" in a medieval manuscript. It may exist, but I haven't seen it yet.