20-04-2016, 07:31 PM
I think we should distinguish two cases. In one case a recipe may look in such way that the grammar simply does not have to manifest itself. Like e.g.:
"sugar bread butter"
This is in essence just an unordered list, so grammar just does not have much room for itself here.
On the contrary, in the cases where grammar rules are applicable, they generally will be applied. Like nobody will write "you has" when grammar prescribes "you have".
Besides, there are no reasonable grounds to consider in advance the text in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. as recipe. Although chances are that the main portion thereof represents a spell or a "charm", there is no evidence that it is a recipe.
The occurrence of "anchiton" that you quote is very interesting. The Exodus speaks of the "setim" wood, the origin of which is unknown but it is believed to be Acacia. Does anyone know why it is called "anchiton" in the comments? And what is "ligno fimile", mentioned as a synonym to anchiton?
"sugar bread butter"
This is in essence just an unordered list, so grammar just does not have much room for itself here.
On the contrary, in the cases where grammar rules are applicable, they generally will be applied. Like nobody will write "you has" when grammar prescribes "you have".
Besides, there are no reasonable grounds to consider in advance the text in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. as recipe. Although chances are that the main portion thereof represents a spell or a "charm", there is no evidence that it is a recipe.
The occurrence of "anchiton" that you quote is very interesting. The Exodus speaks of the "setim" wood, the origin of which is unknown but it is believed to be Acacia. Does anyone know why it is called "anchiton" in the comments? And what is "ligno fimile", mentioned as a synonym to anchiton?