13-06-2020, 07:01 AM
For a long time I propose to blot (dot filled with “o”) as an independent glyph.
Arguments ..
1 / examples 55a and 55b are taken into account in codes v101
2 / most of the blots (dots) have a height less than e, o - eva.
3 / why is eva-e in the left foot of the bench 10 times more likely to turn into a blot than in the right foot? After all, this is one and the same movement of the pen. I think this is due to the different frequency of combinations of sounds in the language.
4 / was the scribe really so sloppy that in example 61 he immediately put 3 blots?
5 / in examples 53, 56, 57 it is clearly seen that the clerk does not try to write a point in the base of the string (as is done when writing e, o-eva), but binds it above to “c” -eva. It looks like a mirror for example 55a.
Arguments ..
1 / examples 55a and 55b are taken into account in codes v101
2 / most of the blots (dots) have a height less than e, o - eva.
3 / why is eva-e in the left foot of the bench 10 times more likely to turn into a blot than in the right foot? After all, this is one and the same movement of the pen. I think this is due to the different frequency of combinations of sounds in the language.
4 / was the scribe really so sloppy that in example 61 he immediately put 3 blots?
5 / in examples 53, 56, 57 it is clearly seen that the clerk does not try to write a point in the base of the string (as is done when writing e, o-eva), but binds it above to “c” -eva. It looks like a mirror for example 55a.