(14-08-2020, 12:40 PM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.What surprised me was that the level of agreement was much lower than I expected.
That was anticipated, and that's in fact the good thing, because it filters through only stone-and-concrete statements with which almosty everyone agrees. And if a researcher is not familiar with results expressed in such statements, s/he would better take time to study them before proceeding to his/her own developments.
No, the problem definitely was not the low level of consensus, I must plainly confess that I just was too lazy to carry this activity forth, and that's the main reason.
