previous Basque theories of the Voynich ms?

[Emma May Smith]

May I ask what other types of evidence within the ms itself that you would look for to generate a hypothesis about the possible language in which the text is written?

I would like you to demonstrate:

• Why a particular glyph should be identified as a vowel.
  
• Why a particular glyph should be a plosive/fricative/liquid/nasal/semivowel.
  
• Why particular words or affixes should be considered specific parts of the grammar.
  

The idea is that even without a candidate language, you should be able to demonstrate the principles of the underlying language. Starting from internal evidence only I want you to argue how you got to the idea that [r] = /r/ or [l] = /l/. Can you demonstrate that they fit into a class like liquids? That clusters such as [lk] = /lt/ make sense? That [chedy] = /hik/ "you (erg)" makes sense? What is "you" doing in the text? What verbs does it relate to?