27-06-2016, 10:32 AM
(26-06-2016, 01:56 PM)Diane wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Searcher
You can link to the Beinecke library's high-res scans
The list of the new scans is here:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
To cross-check the folio number with the SCAN ID, you'll probably need to go to the Beinecke library site where the ID number for each scans is shown, folio by folio below the picture.
It's a nuisance, and time consuming to have to cross-check like that and one of these days someone might publish here a concordance - if it has been done already, the persons who have done haven't shared it here - yet.
Diane
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
To be honest, I'm not sure that someone will see this, as no one saw it earlier, as much as the word You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. a little below, and, I think, majority doesn't believe in this. So, my question is rather hypothetical here, at least, I wanted everyone to consider it just so in this case.
This question - "Could such data ( absecta (cut line), recta (straight line), 154, 6 and the rest supposed information) show something important in the VMs, some coordinates, date etc.?
Actually, these notes are less visible on the new Beinecke scan (1006231), perhaps, since a camera was more focused on the opposite side (with the "T/O map"), which was less clear earlier. On this reason I use the previous copy studying this fragment.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.