15-04-2021, 05:18 AM
Just one more outrageous idea to add to this line of thought:
Imagine a (Middle) English lipogrammatic text without the letters...ABC !
This would actually also explain EVA [qokeedy] = "neece" ('niece'), [qokedy] = "nece" ('nice', or in Middle English 'foolish, naive; wanton, sinful; cunning; strange, odd, bizarre'), since without the "c", one would have to use "s", which I am already assigning to EVA [d].
Further, the character combination that would logically represent "b" could thus rather represent "f", or "v", which are otherwise difficult to include within the correspondence table according to my hypothesis.
Geoffrey S.
Imagine a (Middle) English lipogrammatic text without the letters...ABC !
This would actually also explain EVA [qokeedy] = "neece" ('niece'), [qokedy] = "nece" ('nice', or in Middle English 'foolish, naive; wanton, sinful; cunning; strange, odd, bizarre'), since without the "c", one would have to use "s", which I am already assigning to EVA [d].
Further, the character combination that would logically represent "b" could thus rather represent "f", or "v", which are otherwise difficult to include within the correspondence table according to my hypothesis.
Geoffrey S.