The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Undefined variable $can_link - Line: 6 - File: showthread.php(1658) : eval()'d code PHP 8.5.12 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/class_error.php 157 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php(1658) : eval()'d code 6 errorHandler->error_callback
/showthread.php 1658 eval




[split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov
#49
Although interesting, "gaf" is less likely than "gas" - first because there's virtually no place for the stroke, second because there is a character much like "f" in Line 0 (in that extremely strange last word which seems to end with "fer"), and its shape differs from the hypothetic "f" in "gaf"

"So nim gas mich" has the following advantages:

- it sounds natural (no deviations)
- it generally fits into possible contexts
- letter shapes are in accordance with other letters in the folio

And it has only two drawbacks:

- there's actually no space between "gas" and "mich"
- the round object is unexplained

But neither of these two is avoided with "gaf" instead of "gas".

So my vote would be for "gas" as a working thread.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] Discussion of f116v interpretations by Anton Alipov - by Anton - 18-07-2016, 11:41 AM
"gaf mich" on f116v marginalia - by Torsten - 24-11-2016, 12:22 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Big f116v spillover thread. ololololo 101 15,809 Yesterday, 07:03 AM
Last Post: Koen G
  [split] Marginalia Latin script [GENERAL DISCUSSION] -JKP- 16 20,822 20-10-2026, 10:20 PM
Last Post: Carnby
  [split] Palaeography of f116v Aga Tentakulus 19 22,832 14-02-2021, 05:25 AM
Last Post: Aga Tentakulus

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)