16-05-2021, 09:30 PM
(16-05-2021, 08:09 PM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The fact that the calibrated uncertainties are much smaller than the uncalibrated onesIf we use calendar dates so that sigma is 15 rather than 35 that surely changes my perception of the consistency among the results. Except that the range of the calendar dates for the individual samples also narrows, to 1410 for the oldest and 1426 for the newest!
Why do we calculate the calendar dates and then seem to ignore them? Is there an a priori reason for this?

