29-10-2021, 01:01 PM
(20-10-2021, 12:50 PM)nablator wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(19-10-2021, 03:58 PM)Maria Rita Lunazzi wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Inoltre, nell'alfabeto EVA i glifi sono troppo standardizzati.
Per es. Non tiene conto delle varie curvature dei segni diacritici
That's true, but it could be fixed in a better transliteration if we had consistent characteristics to identify. Instead we have a continuum. In your own writing I don't see the differences (=) between those you interpret differently:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.
I have published a more detailed chart.
The main difficulty to get a correct transliteration of the manuscript's handwriting is to distinguish the similar glyphs.
There are 4 levels of control to be applied when there is a doubt:
- by magnifying the sign, examine the sequence of the traits, an inverted U with a tail can be confused with an a.
- des or est can be confused with 8
- the bench. C--C can be confuse with C - - T
The 4th level is syntactic by exclusion
Even if I have all the correspondence Glyph- alphabet letters, the problem is to correctly read the glyphs and not confuse them.