25-12-2021, 12:19 PM
@Mark
Let's assume you would do it this way.
All finds of people give 1000 samples as an example.
Now such are deducted where one could know.
Tepenec, Wilfried, the librarian, and so on.
Not to forget, LFD had it already in the fingers
.
Now you need reverence samples from the other 900. Where will you get them from, if you have no idea where to look. Now the whole thing becomes as good as impossible.
The book would be more damaged than the insects could have ever done.
If I take the clues where the book gives me, without any self-interpretation, I already have a good basis. If I would check now still the parchment of the calf on its origin and family tree (what was suggested), then this would be more useful than 900 open possibilities. Looking at the author.
From this point of view Koen is right.
Translated with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (free version)
Let's assume you would do it this way.
All finds of people give 1000 samples as an example.
Now such are deducted where one could know.
Tepenec, Wilfried, the librarian, and so on.
Not to forget, LFD had it already in the fingers
.Now you need reverence samples from the other 900. Where will you get them from, if you have no idea where to look. Now the whole thing becomes as good as impossible.
The book would be more damaged than the insects could have ever done.
If I take the clues where the book gives me, without any self-interpretation, I already have a good basis. If I would check now still the parchment of the calf on its origin and family tree (what was suggested), then this would be more useful than 900 open possibilities. Looking at the author.
From this point of view Koen is right.
Translated with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (free version)